Wednesday, March 1, 2017

The motorist/cyclist dichotomy

If there is one thing that has seemingly followed me everywhere within my handful of years riding it is, in a word vulnerability.  Cycling in the city is a fine-line dance between gliding gracefully through the ebb and flow of people, cars, infrastructure and terrain while avoiding accident, harassment, anxiety and humiliating faux pas.  The act can be equally elating and inspiring as it can be dangerous, uncomfortable and disenfranchising.  As cyclists we are constantly engaging in an activity that renders us, to one degree or another vulnerable.  Managing to co-exist and navigate the ever changing urban landscape can seem at times to be as much a test of patience and sanity as it is of pleasurable sporting.

The car is not your enemy


There seems to be a common school of thought with many cyclists that very much parallels the "us vs them" mentality when it comes to automobiles and the people who pilot them.  The seeming lack of co-operation between cyclists and motorist appears on the surface to primarily be agitated by aggressive, impatient drivers who contend for the bulk of our road's real estate.  Often times, and more so than not, this has indeed been the case for many cyclists; but ultimately the situation is no where near as black and white as is often described. These daily commuters (motorists) are painted as materialistic, wasteful, incompetent and unaware while cyclists tend to benefit from the longer end of the stick.  All to often the cyclist is always seen as maintaining the "right of way" even in the most questionable situations.  Tough the stories have been told of how it is that cyclists struggle massively to operate within the confides of the cities motorist density, there seems to be an unwarranted amount of unwillingness on the part of the cyclist to function in conjunction with motorists than vice-a-versa.   By subscribing to divisive mentalities such as the aforementioned the cyclist puts them self in a dangerous box of self designated alienation.


Neither the bike nor the car win here..

You, me and the rest of us


Many a time I have watched aggressive cyclists pull off shenanigans that are not only endangering themselves but simultaneously bring risk to surrounding pedestrians and motorists alike.  Assuming a first priority role as a cyclist is almost a guaranteed way of  hurdling yourself into pain and creating a bigger mess out what usually starts as a small error.  Cutting off drivers, running clearly active red lights, speedily darting between cars in parking lots; these are staple examples of behavior that give cyclists a negative image and perpetuate the motorist/cyclist dichotomy.  By being unwilling to work with one another we build another wall for ourselves and further perpetuate the hostility and territorial attitudes that underscore urban navigation.  As the bike is supposed to embody acts of freedom, grace, and unhindered movement; division, unaccountably and incompetence will negate all such beauty via lack of co-existence.  In the same way that walking pedestrians nod heads and cast gentle glances to cyclists and people using other modes of transport (skateboards, roller blades, scooters ect) we as cyclists have a fundamental duty to support the atmosphere within which we operate.  It is to the degree that we view our neighbors (yes motorists) as alien that we will continue to the very same degree see a negative split in our social fabric.  We are in this together after all; so lets think about treating one another like so.


No comments:

Post a Comment